New Global Data: Physiotherapists Triage Rheumatology Patients Effectively

A recent study highlights the feasibility and effectiveness of physiotherapist-led rheumatology triage, suggesting that it can accurately identify urgent cases of inflammatory arthritis, potentially alleviating the burden on rheumatologists and improving patient care in healthcare systems worldwide.

The global shortage of rheumatologists has significantly impacted timely access to care for patients with rheumatological conditions. This challenge underscores the need for efficient triage processes to ensure that limited resources are used effectively. A recent study published in April 2024 in The Journal of Rheumatology by Janet H. Roberts and colleagues has shed light on an innovative approach: physiotherapist-led triage in rheumatology settings.

Rheumatology deals with diagnosing and treating conditions affecting joints, muscles, and bones. Given the rising demand and limited number of specialists, many patients experience delays in assessment and treatment. Efficient triage is essential to prioritize patients needing urgent care. Traditionally, rheumatologists have handled triage, but increasing demand has driven the exploration of alternative methods.

The study aimed to determine if physiotherapists, using a standardized protocol, could triage patients as effectively as rheumatologists in identifying inflammatory arthritis (IA) cases. The hypothesis was that physiotherapist-led triage could match the accuracy of rheumatologist-led triage, thereby alleviating some of the burdens on rheumatologists.

This prospective, non-blinded, randomized, parallel-group feasibility study was conducted at a tertiary care rheumatology clinic. A total of 203 patient referrals were randomized equally into physiotherapist-led and rheumatologist-led triage groups. Standardized data collection occurred at referral receipt, triage, and clinic visits. The accuracy of triage was measured against the gold-standard IA diagnosis by rheumatologists.

The study revealed that 65% of referrals triaged as urgent by physiotherapists were confirmed as IA, compared to 60% in the rheumatologist-led group, with no significant difference (p=0.57). Physiotherapists declined more referrals (24 vs. 8, p=0.002) and had fewer semi-urgent classifications (6 vs. 23, p < 0.003). Only one IA case in the rheumatologist arm was incorrectly triaged, leading to a delay in assessment.

These findings suggest that physiotherapist-led triage is not only feasible but also comparable to rheumatologist-led triage in identifying urgent IA cases. The more stringent triage process by physiotherapists, indicated by higher referral declines and fewer semi-urgent classifications, potentially reduces unnecessary in-clinic visits.

Global Perspective on Physiotherapist-Led Triage

Physiotherapist-led triage systems have been explored in various medical fields worldwide, demonstrating their potential effectiveness and efficiency.

- United Kingdom: In musculoskeletal clinics, physiotherapists have successfully triaged patients, determining appropriate care pathways and reducing waiting times. Studies have shown that physiotherapists can effectively differentiate between patients needing surgical consultations and those who can be managed conservatively.

- Australia: Similar to the UK, Australia has implemented physiotherapist-led triage in orthopedic settings with positive outcomes. This approach has streamlined patient care, optimized resource use, and improved patient satisfaction.

- Canada: The recent study by Roberts et al. highlights the potential for physiotherapist-led triage in rheumatology clinics, offering a feasible alternative to traditional methods and showcasing the role of physiotherapists in managing patient referrals efficiently.

- United States: In the United States, physiotherapist-led triage is gaining traction in certain specialties, particularly within musculoskeletal and orthopedic care. Studies have shown that physiotherapists can effectively triage patients, leading to reduced waiting times and improved patient outcomes. However, the adoption in rheumatology remains limited due to regulatory and reimbursement challenges.

- Arab Countries: In Arab countries, the implementation of physiotherapist-led triage is still in its early stages. The healthcare systems in these regions are gradually recognizing the role of physiotherapists, but widespread adoption is hindered by regulatory frameworks and limited training opportunities. However, initiatives in countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are paving the way for broader acceptance and integration of physiotherapist-led models in various medical specialties.

- Africa: In many African countries, the healthcare infrastructure faces significant challenges, including workforce shortages and limited resources. While physiotherapists play a critical role in healthcare delivery, the concept of physiotherapist-led triage is not widely adopted. Efforts are being made to enhance the training and integration of physiotherapists into primary and specialized care settings, with pilot programs in countries like South Africa and Kenya showing promise. These initiatives aim to improve access to care and optimize the use of healthcare resources.

- China: In China, physiotherapist-led triage is a relatively new concept but is gradually being explored, particularly in urban healthcare settings where the burden on specialists is high. The integration of physiotherapists into triage processes is supported by recent healthcare reforms aimed at improving efficiency and patient outcomes. Studies indicate that physiotherapist-led triage can reduce waiting times and improve patient satisfaction in musculoskeletal and orthopedic clinics.

- Japan: Japan has a well-established healthcare system that increasingly recognizes the role of physiotherapists in patient management. Physiotherapist-led triage is being implemented in some hospitals and clinics, particularly in musculoskeletal care. This approach has shown potential in streamlining patient flow and reducing the burden on orthopedic surgeons. Continued research and pilot programs are helping to refine these triage processes and demonstrate their effectiveness in the Japanese healthcare context.

Despite the success stories, some countries have yet to adopt physiotherapist-led triage widely. Barriers include regulatory restrictions, lack of standardized training programs, and resistance from medical professionals accustomed to traditional models of care. Overcoming these barriers requires concerted efforts from healthcare policymakers, educators, and professional bodies to recognize and support the role of physiotherapists in triage processes.

For rheumatology clinics, incorporating physiotherapist-led triage could be a viable strategy to manage patient referrals more effectively. Establishing training programs and standardized protocols for physiotherapists will ensure accuracy and consistency in triage decisions. Healthcare policymakers should consider supporting such initiatives to optimize care delivery amidst workforce constraints.

The study by Roberts et al. adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the role of physiotherapists in triage processes. Physiotherapist-led rheumatology triage is feasible, reliable, and can significantly improve the management of rheumatological conditions. This approach can alleviate pressures on rheumatologists, allowing them to focus on complex cases and ensuring timely and appropriate care for patients.

As healthcare systems worldwide grapple with resource allocation challenges, innovative solutions like physiotherapist-led triage are crucial. Broader implementation and further research on such models could enhance patient care and streamline the management of chronic conditions like inflammatory arthritis.

References

1. Roberts, J. H., Gun, C., Mackinnon, J. E., Parlee, S., Bakowsky, V., Taylor, T., Barber, C. E. H., & Hanly, J. G. (2024). Feasibility of physiotherapist-led rheumatology triage: A randomized study. The Journal of Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2023-1071

2. Desmeules, F., Roy, J. S., MacDermid, J. C., Champagne, F., Hinse, O., & Woodhouse, L. J. (2012). Advanced practice physiotherapy in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 13, 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-107

3. Pearse, E. O., Nicholson, J. A., & Kelly, M. H. (2006). An evaluation of the effectiveness of musculoskeletal triage by extended scope physiotherapists. Clinical Governance: An International Journal, 11(4), 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777270610713829

4. Samsson, K., & Bernhardsson, S. (2019). Clinical physiotherapy assessment of patients referred for orthopaedic consultation: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 9(1), e024682. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024682

5. Hourigan, P. G., Weatherley, C. R., & Ide, L. (1996). Initial assessment and management of spinal conditions in an orthopaedic clinic: The role of a physiotherapist. Physiotherapy, 82(7), 392-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66991-4

6. Gormley, G. J., Steele, W. K., Gilliland, A., Leggett, P., Wright, G. D., Bell, A. L., & Matthews, C. (2003). Can diagnostic triage by general practitioners improve the detection of synovitis in new patients with musculoskeletal pain? Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 62(7), 641-643. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.62.7.641

7. Zangger, P., Lam, P., & Theiler, R. (2010). A cost-effective screening method for identifying patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis. Swiss Medical Weekly, 140(21-22), 318-323. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2010.12847

8. Walsh, N. E., & Hall, M. (2002). Joint manipulation and mobilization in the treatment of chronic pain: A review. Clinical Journal of Pain, 18(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200201000-00004

9. Stanhope, J., Grimmer, K., & Degabriele, J. (2012). Use of an evidence-based screening tool to improve the management of inflammatory arthritis. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 58(2), 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.07.002

10. de Zwart, B. C. H., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & van Duivenbooden, C. (2002). Physical workload and the aging worker: A review of the literature. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 75(8), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-002-0376-3